The phrase types of lock washers covers multiple designs that resist loosening in different ways. Some add spring force (spring washers), some increase friction (serrated/tooth washers), and some create a mechanical wedge effect (wedge-lock pairs). Choosing the wrong type can turn a “locked” joint into a joint that still loosens under vibration, thermal cycling, or embedment.
A practical approach is to match the washer’s locking mechanism to the failure mode you expect:
Split lock washers are the familiar “cut and twisted ring.” They are intended to add a small spring effect and create edge bite. In practice, their locking performance depends heavily on joint stiffness, surface hardness, and whether the joint experiences transverse motion.
Under higher clamp loads, many split washers flatten quickly, behaving like a plain washer while also adding variability to torque-to-tension due to changing friction. If your design problem is true vibration loosening, treat split washers as “not your first choice” unless test data or a customer spec supports them.
Common specifications include DIN 127 / similar legacy standards, but many industries prefer alternatives for vibration-critical joints.
Tooth lock washers use serrated “teeth” to increase friction and bite into surfaces. They are widely used in electrical and light mechanical assemblies because the teeth can break through oxides/paint and improve electrical continuity while resisting rotation.
A common application is bonding a ground lug to a chassis. The tooth washer is placed so teeth contact the conductive base metal. If the chassis is painted, the teeth can cut through the coating, improving contact. In this scenario, the “locking” benefit comes largely from higher friction and surface bite, not spring action.
Wedge-lock washers are used as a matched pair with cams on the inside and radial serrations on the outside. The cams have a wedge angle designed so that any loosening rotation must climb the cam ramps, which increases clamp length and resists back-off.
These washers depend on correct pairing and orientation. Install them as a mated set (cams facing each other). A common field error is splitting the pair across multiple joints, which defeats the wedge mechanism.
If your requirement is “resist vibration loosening,” wedge-lock designs are frequently selected because the locking effect is not merely friction-based; it is a geometric resistance to back-off.
Belleville washers are conical disc springs. They are chosen less for “anti-rotation bite” and more for maintaining clamp force when there is settling, thermal cycling, gasket creep, or differential expansion. They can be stacked in series/parallel to tune deflection and load.
Suppose an M10 bolt property class 8.8 has a proof stress near 580 MPa. Using a typical engineering target of about 70% of proof for preload and a tensile stress area near 58 mm², an approximate preload is:
Preload ≈ 0.7 × 580 MPa × 58 mm² ≈ 23.5 kN.
A Belleville washer can be selected so that expected joint settling (for example, a small loss of stack height) results in only a modest preload change, improving retention compared with a rigid stack.
Wave washers (multi-wave) and curved spring washers (single-wave/curved) provide lighter spring forces and more deflection than many helical split washers. They are commonly used to reduce rattling, control axial play, and compensate for tolerance stack-up in light-duty assemblies.
These are not usually the first choice for severe vibration loosening. Their value is primarily controlled spring behavior, not anti-rotation geometry.
Tab washers and lock plates use a bend-up tab that physically blocks nut/bolt rotation by engaging a flat, slot, or feature on the fastener and a stationary feature on the assembly. This is a “positive lock” concept rather than a friction/spring concept.
Bending tabs is a form of plastic deformation; many designs are treated as single-use or limited-reuse depending on specification. Ensure the tab washer material and thickness match the torque and flat geometry so the tab does not crack or relax.
Use the table below as a fast filter. Then validate against your joint conditions (vibration level, surface hardness/coatings, temperature, and whether you can tolerate surface marking).
| Type | Primary locking mechanism | Best for | Watch-outs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Split lock washer | Small spring effect + edge bite | Legacy specs, light-duty retention | Can flatten under load; inconsistent vibration performance |
| Tooth (star) washer | Friction + surface bite via teeth | Electrical bonding, sheet metal, light joints | Damages coatings; needs good surface contact |
| Wedge-lock pair | Cam wedge effect resists back-off | High vibration/dynamic shear joints | Must be installed as a pair; can mark surfaces |
| Belleville (disc spring) | Defined spring rate maintains preload | Creep/thermal cycling, gasketed joints | Sizing/stacking matters; not primarily anti-rotation |
| Wave/curved spring washer | Light spring compliance | Rattle control, tolerance compensation | Limited vibration locking; load capacity is lower |
| Tab washer / lock plate | Positive mechanical stop | Safety-critical, inspectable locking | Often single-use/limited reuse; needs matching geometry |
Use this checklist to narrow down the correct option quickly, then validate with testing or prior qualification when the joint is mission-critical.
A robust rule of thumb: locking starts with clamp force. If the joint is under-tightened, no washer will reliably prevent loosening.
Many “lock washer failures” are actually assembly process failures. The points below prevent the most common field issues.
Sometimes the right answer is “no lock washer.” If you need controlled preload and repeatable performance, other strategies can outperform washers:
The most reliable outcome comes from selecting among the types of lock washers based on joint physics: clamp force, slip risk, surface condition, and service environment.