Choose a lock nut when your main risk is loosening from vibration, cyclic loading, or movement. Choose a flange nut when your main need is faster assembly and better load distribution on the joint surface (often replacing a separate washer). If you need both, use a serrated flange lock nut (or pair a standard flange nut with a proven locking method, depending on surface and service conditions).
In practice: flange nuts primarily improve how the load is spread; lock nuts primarily improve how the preload is retained.
A flange nut integrates a washer-like flange under the hex body. That larger bearing face increases contact area, which lowers average surface pressure and helps prevent embedment (the nut sinking into softer materials). It also improves assembly speed because there’s no separate washer to handle.
As a rough, practical benchmark, flange diameters for common metric sizes often increase the bearing contact footprint by ~1.5× to 2.5× compared with a standard hex nut face alone (exact numbers vary by standard, size, and whether a washer would otherwise be used). That’s why flange nuts are common on automotive brackets and sheet-metal assemblies.
A lock nut adds resistance to rotation after tightening. The most common mechanisms are:
The key idea: a lock nut is designed so that loosening requires additional torque beyond what normal thread friction provides.
| Feature | Flange Nut | Lock Nut |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Spread load / replace washer | Resist loosening (prevailing torque) |
| Best for vibration | Only if it also has a locking feature | Yes (designed for it) |
| Surface protection | Good (non-serrated flange) | Varies (serrated types can mark surfaces) |
| Part count | Often reduces (no washer needed) | May be one part, but sometimes still paired with washers |
| Typical temperature tolerance | High (all-metal) | Nylon-insert: typically up to ~120°C; all-metal: higher |
| Reusability | Usually reusable if threads and face are intact | Limited for nylon-insert; all-metal depends on prevailing torque retention |
If you fasten a bracket to thin sheet metal, surface pressure and embedment are common failure modes (paint compresses, sheet dimples, preload drops). A flange nut can reduce those issues by increasing bearing area without adding a washer.
Practical takeaway: if your joint is mostly static (low vibration) but the material under the nut is thin or coated, a non-serrated flange nut is often the simplest upgrade over a standard hex nut.
In vibrating machinery, the failure mode is usually rotational loosening plus gradual preload loss. Here, the locking mechanism matters more than bearing area.
Bottom line: vibration drives you toward lock nuts; flange features are secondary unless you also need better load spreading.
Nylon-insert lock nuts can lose locking effectiveness as temperature rises. A common rule of thumb is to avoid them for continuous service much above ~120°C and switch to all-metal locking designs. If you also need load distribution, an all-metal flange-style lock nut (design-dependent) is a better fit than a nyloc.
With lock nuts, part of your applied torque is consumed by the locking feature (prevailing torque) rather than generating clamp load. That means two nuts tightened to the same torque can produce different clamp loads if one has a strong prevailing torque feature.
If you must stay torque-only: treat a switch from standard nuts to lock nuts as a process change—verify clamp load (even with simple test methods) rather than assuming identical performance.
Flange nut vs lock nut comes down to your dominant risk: if you’re fighting surface damage and uneven bearing, pick a flange nut; if you’re fighting loosening from vibration or cycling, pick a lock nut; if you’re fighting both, use a flange-style locking solution that matches your temperature and surface constraints.